Several years ago, in about 2009-10, I read three books on the Rwandan Genocide. I can’t remember what prompted me to engage such a grim topic at the time—perhaps it was watching Hotel Rwanda—but I remember the gloom that settled over my soul for days afterwards.

Towards the end of Romans 1, the apostle Paul shows the horrific consequences of humanity turning away from God and his truth. People embrace a lie based on the distorted desires of the heart. As punishment, God gives them what they want, or as Paul puts it, “hands them over” (vv. 24, 26, 28) to their desires and allows them to reap the fruit of their folly.

As is often observed, when the apostle John speaks of the eternal Word becoming flesh, and “taking up residence” or “pitching a tent” among us, he is alluding to Israel’s time in the desert, where God once dwelt among his people in the tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting.

Abuse NDAs (Non-Disclosure Agreements) are an offence to God, and an assault on the dignity of his image bearers. Here are ten reasons why.

The sixth instalment in a series on Matthew 7:15-23, continuing to think about what it means to recognise wolves by their fruit (Matthew 7:16, 20). This post considers how the fruit test gets misapplied as a performance test.

The fifth instalment in a series on Matthew 7:15-23. This and the next post consider how in practice we can recognise wolves by their fruit (Matthew 7:16, 20). In this post I look at what doesn’t count as good fruit, and how to apply the fruit test as a paternity test.

The fourth instalment in a series on Matthew 7:15-23. This and the next two posts consider the meaning and application of Jesus’ words, “You will recognize them by their fruit.” It is easy to misunderstand and misapply Jesus’ words, because we treat the fruit test as a performance test, rather than a paternity test.

This is the third instalment in a series on Matthew 7:15-23. We turn our attention to the prophet-wolves’ activity, seeking to discern it from the metaphor itself, the OT background (see the previous post), and the context and concerns of the Sermon on the Mount.

Jesus presents the enemies of his kingdom from three perspectives: (1) with respect to their religious office or function, they are false prophets; (2) with respect to their inner nature, they are ravenous wolves; and (3) with respect to their outward appearance, they wear sheep’s clothing.

There’s a lot to ponder in this passage. And it touches on many present concerns in the church: abuse and safeguarding; truth and falsehood; identity and character. As such, I want to understand it better. And I’d love it if you joined me in my exploration over the next few weeks.